Q13
3 marksShort AnswerSection A

(a) Mention any one harmful effect of using plastic bags on the environment. Suggest better alternatives to the usage of plastic bags.

(b) Paddy fields require a large amount of water. The pesticides and chemical fertilizers used are washed down into the soil or waterbodies. How do these chemicals reach our bodies? What is this phenomenon known as?

Also asked in:2026
Our Environment
Plastic pollution and biological magnification
Official Answer

(a) Harmful effect of plastic bags and alternatives:


Plastic is non-biodegradable — it is not broken down by the enzymes of decomposer microorganisms (bacteria, fungi) and so persists in the environment for a very long time. One major harmful effect: plastic bags choke drains and soil, and when ingested by grazing animals (cattle, stray animals often eat plastic mixed with food waste), they block the digestive tract, causing illness or death of the animal. (Other valid effects: they clog soil pores and waterlogged drains, preventing water percolation and causing water-logging/flooding; they persist for hundreds of years, accumulating as permanent litter and polluting land and water bodies.)


Better alternatives: cloth bags, jute bags, paper bags — all made of natural, biodegradable materials that decomposers can break down, unlike plastic.


(b) How pesticides/fertilizers reach our bodies:


Paddy fields require large amounts of water, and pesticides and chemical fertilizers applied to the field are washed down by this water into the soil or into water bodies (rivers, ponds). From the soil, these chemicals are absorbed by plant roots along with water and minerals; from water bodies, they are taken up by aquatic plants and animals. In this way the chemicals enter the food chain at the producer level.


Since these chemicals are non-degradable, they are not excreted and instead get accumulated progressively at each successive trophic level as one organism eats another — herbivores accumulate more than plants, carnivores accumulate more than herbivores, and so on. Because human beings occupy the topmost level of most food chains, the maximum concentration of these harmful chemicals gets accumulated in the human body, through eating contaminated grains (wheat, rice), vegetables, fruits, and meat.


This phenomenon — the increasing concentration of a harmful, non-degradable chemical at successive trophic levels of a food chain — is known as biological magnification.

non-biodegradablecloth bagsjute bagsfood chaintrophic levelbiological magnificationpesticides

Marking Scheme

  • 11 mark: One correct harmful effect of plastic bags + valid alternative(s) named
  • 21 mark: Correct explanation of pathway — irrigation water washes chemicals into soil/water bodies, absorbed by plants/aquatic organisms, entering food chain
  • 31 mark: Naming the phenomenon as biological magnification, with reasoning that humans (top of food chain) accumulate maximum concentration

Quick Oral Answer

Plastic bags are non-biodegradable and choke drains/harm animals if ingested; pesticides washed into soil/water enter the food chain and accumulate at each trophic level — this is biological magnification, with maximum concentration in humans at the top.

Analysis & Explanation

This is a two-part application question grounded directly in the chapter's discussion of waste management and food-chain contamination.


Part (a) tests understanding that plastic is non-biodegradable (unlike paper/cloth), so it persists and physically harms the environment and animals, unlike biodegradable alternatives which decomposers can break down.


Part (b) tests the exact mechanism described in the chapter: pesticides/fertilizers washed from fields into soil/water bodies are absorbed by producers (plants), then passed up the food chain; because they are non-degradable they accumulate progressively at each trophic level (biological magnification), with humans — at the top of the food chain — accumulating the highest concentration. This explains why washing food does not fully remove pesticide residues, as stated in the text.

Common Mistakes

  1. 1Stating only that plastic 'pollutes the environment' without a specific mechanism (e.g., choking drains/animals) as required for full marks.
  2. 2Forgetting to name the phenomenon (biological magnification) in part (b), or describing the entry route without connecting it to the food chain and trophic levels.
  3. 3Confusing biodegradable alternatives (cloth, jute, paper bags) with 'biodegradable plastic', which the chapter treats as a separate, debated category.

Interesting Facts

Because pesticide residues get chemically bound within plant/animal tissue via biological magnification, the chapter notes they 'cannot always be removed by washing or other means' — this is why crop-level pesticide control matters more than post-harvest washing.

Spotted a mistake or something unclear?

Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many marks does this question carry in CBSE Class 10 Science 2026?

This question carries 3 marks in the CBSE Class 10 Science 2026 examination.

Which chapter does this question come from in Science?

This question is from the chapter "Our Environment" in the CBSE Class 10 Science syllabus.

What topic does this question cover in Science?

This question covers the topic "Plastic pollution and biological magnification" from CBSE Class 10 Science.

Has this question appeared in other CBSE Science papers?

Yes, a similar question appeared in the 2026 CBSE Class 10 Science paper.

What type of question is this in the CBSE Class 10 Science 2026 paper?

This is a Short Answer question from Section A in the CBSE Class 10 Science 2026 paper.