(a) Check whether the function f(x) defined as is continuous at or not.
OR
(b) If , then find at .
(a) Check whether the function f(x) defined as is continuous at or not.
OR
(b) If , then find at .
This question carries an internal choice; either part, fully answered, earns full marks.
Part (a) — Continuity at
- Left-hand limit (): since , , so . Hence .
- Value and right-hand limit (): , so and RHL = −1/2.
- Since , the function is continuous at .
Part (b) — Implicit differentiation
Differentiating gives . At : , , so .
Marking Scheme
- 1Part (a): 1 mark for correctly evaluating (handling on ); 1 mark for showing and concluding continuity.
- 2Part (b): 1 mark for correct implicit differentiation giving ; 1 mark for substituting the point to get .
Hint
Part (a): on , replace by and simplify, then compare LHL, and RHL. Part (b): differentiate both sides with respect to x (chain rule on , product rule on ), solve for , then substitute .
Quick Oral Answer
For part (a), on the modulus makes , and the branch gives with the same right limit, so and f is continuous. For part (b), implicit differentiation of gives , which is at .
Analysis & Explanation
This VSA offers a choice between a continuity check and an implicit-differentiation problem.
Part (a) — concept: A function is continuous at x = a when the left-hand limit, the right-hand limit and the functional value all coincide: . The catch here is the modulus branch for : because x − 3 is negative, , which cancels the denominator to a constant . The branch gives the value and the right limit at 3, both . All three agree, so f is continuous.
Part (b) — concept: When a curve mixes , and , y cannot be isolated, so we differentiate implicitly — chain rule on y² (→ ) and product rule on (→ ) — then solve for dy/dx and substitute the point. The point does lie on the curve since .
Exam trap: In (a), students forget that |x − 3| flips sign on the side and wrongly get +1/2, concluding discontinuity; in (b), they forget the product rule on the term.
Common Mistakes
- 1On the branch, forgetting that , which reverses the sign of the limit (getting instead of ) and a wrong conclusion of discontinuity.
- 2Checking only one side (LHL or RHL) instead of confirming for continuity.
- 3In part (b), forgetting the product rule on or the chain rule on while differentiating implicitly.
Interesting Facts
The expression is the classic 'sign function' building block: it equals on one side of and on the other, so such piecewise functions are prime material for testing one-sided limits.
Implicit differentiation lets us find slopes on curves like that cannot be rearranged into , which is why it is indispensable for conics and other implicitly-defined relations.
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the modulus affect the left-hand limit at ?
For , is negative, so . The branch therefore simplifies to for every , making the left-hand limit exactly −1/2.
How do you differentiate implicitly?
Differentiate each side with respect to x, treating y as a function of x: the left side gives and the right side gives by the product rule. Then collect dy/dx terms and solve, giving .