Explain the reason of low variation between male workers of 'primary' and 'tertiary' sectors.
Explain the reason of low variation between male workers of 'primary' and 'tertiary' sectors.
Male workers are almost evenly split between the primary (16.54 crore) and tertiary (15.66 crore) sectors, showing a much smaller gap than among female workers.
- Men generally have greater access to education, skill training and mobility (including rural-to-urban migration), allowing many to shift from agriculture into tertiary jobs such as trade, transport, administration and other services.
- With fewer social restrictions on movement than women, male employment is more evenly diversified across sectors, while still retaining a large agricultural base since farming and land ownership in India remain predominantly male-led.
Marking Scheme
- 11 mark: correct reason — greater male access to education/training/mobility allows diversification into tertiary jobs while retaining a large agricultural base, keeping the two sectors' shares closer.
Hint
Link the near-balance to men's greater access to education, training and mobility that allows movement between agriculture and tertiary/service jobs.
Quick Oral Answer
Male workers show near-equal shares in primary and tertiary sectors because greater access to education, training and mobility lets many men move into service jobs, while land ownership patterns keep a substantial number still engaged in agriculture.
Analysis & Explanation
The near-equal split of male workers between primary and tertiary sectors contrasts sharply with the female pattern (Q23.1), where primary sector participation is almost double the tertiary share.
Concept: Access to education, skill development and geographic mobility strongly influences a worker's ability to move out of agriculture into higher-value service employment. Men in India have historically had greater access to these enabling factors, allowing a larger proportion to enter tertiary occupations.
Exam trap: Students sometimes wrongly conclude that men and women have similar overall workforce participation; the low variation here refers specifically to the internal primary-vs-tertiary split among male workers, not to gender parity in total employment.
Common Mistakes
- 1Confusing 'low variation between primary and tertiary' with 'equal total employment of men and women.'
- 2Not explaining the enabling factors (education, training, mobility) behind men's more even sectoral spread.
Interesting Facts
Rural-to-urban male migration for work is significantly higher than female migration for work in India, contributing to greater male presence in urban tertiary-sector jobs.
In many Indian states, land ownership records show a strong male bias, which keeps a large share of male workers tied to primary-sector agriculture even as tertiary employment grows.
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.
Frequently Asked Questions
What percentage difference exists between male primary and tertiary workers?
Male primary workers are about 16.54 crore and male tertiary workers about 15.66 crore — a difference of under 1 crore, a much smaller gap than the female primary-tertiary difference.
Why do more men move from agriculture to tertiary jobs than women?
Men generally have wider access to education, technical training and mobility (including migration for work), enabling easier movement into trade, transport, administration and service occupations.