Read the following statements carefully :
Statement 1 : During the British rule in India, the export surplus was utilised to import of invisible items from Britain.
Statement 2 : Indians paid for the expenses incurred by an office set up by the colonial government in Britain.
In the light of above statements, choose the correct option from the following :
Read the following statements carefully :
Statement 1 : During the British rule in India, the export surplus was utilised to import of invisible items from Britain.
Statement 2 : Indians paid for the expenses incurred by an office set up by the colonial government in Britain.
In the light of above statements, choose the correct option from the following :
Options
Correct option: (C) Both statements 1 and 2 are true.
During British rule, India generated a large export surplus, but this surplus was not used to bring wealth or capital goods into India. Instead, it financed 'Home Charges' — expenses of the colonial administration in Britain, including an office of the Secretary of State for India, war expenses and other invisible items — meaning Indians effectively financed their own exploitation.
Marking Scheme
- 11 mark: correctly selects option C (both statements true); no partial marking for MCQ.
Hint
Recall the 'drain of wealth' — India's export surplus funded Britain's administrative and war expenses, not India's development.
Quick Oral Answer
Both statements are true — India's colonial-era export surplus was drained away to pay for the British administration's expenses in Britain, including the India Office, rather than being used for India's own development.
Analysis & Explanation
Why the key is correct
- Statement 1 is true: the export surplus generated through India's trade did not bring gold, silver or capital goods into India; it funded invisible imports — administrative and other expenses of the British government.
- Statement 2 is true: Indians bore the cost of running the India Office and other colonial administrative machinery set up in Britain, along with expenses of wars fought by the British.
Why the distractors are wrong
- Option A (only Statement 1 true) wrongly rejects Statement 2, ignoring that Home Charges explicitly included the cost of the colonial office in Britain.
- Option B (only Statement 2 true) wrongly rejects Statement 1, ignoring that the export surplus itself funded these invisible payments.
- Option D (both false) contradicts the well-established NCERT account of the drain of wealth during colonial rule.
Common Mistakes
- 1Assuming an export surplus must automatically benefit the exporting country, without considering how the surplus was actually used.
- 2Not knowing that 'Home Charges' included the cost of running colonial administrative offices in Britain, financed by Indian revenue.
Interesting Facts
Despite India running a trade (export) surplus for most of the colonial period, this surplus never translated into capital accumulation within India — it was drained out as 'Home Charges'.
The 'drain of wealth' theory was most famously articulated by Dadabhai Naoroji in his book 'Poverty and Un-British Rule in India' (1901).
Home Charges included payments for the India Office in London, pensions of British officials, interest on loans raised in Britain, and expenditure on wars charged to the Indian treasury.
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is meant by 'drain of wealth' in colonial India?
It refers to the transfer of India's wealth to Britain without adequate return, mainly through the export surplus being used to pay for Home Charges — administrative, military and other expenses of British rule — instead of financing India's development.
What were 'Home Charges'?
Home Charges were payments India was forced to make to Britain for expenses like the salaries and pensions of British officials, the cost of the India Office in London, interest on debt, and war expenditure.