If and , then is equal to :
If and , then is equal to :
Options
Official answer
The correct option is B) .
Working:
- , .
- .
- .
Marking scheme
- 1.1 mark: correct and via division by (option B).
Hint
Find first, then ; do not forget the second division by .
Quick oral answer
is ; differentiating with respect to t gives 3/2, and dividing again by gives .
Common mistakes
- 1.Forgetting to divide the second time by , giving the wrong answer .
- 2.Differentiating with respect to x directly, which is not possible in parametric form.
- 3.Arithmetic slip: is , not .
Analysis and explanation
This tests the second-order derivative of a parametric function — a common exam trap.
Concept:
- For parametric , : .
- Crucially, — you must divide again by , NOT differentiate with respect to t alone.
Why B is correct:
- ; differentiating w.r.t. t gives 3/2; dividing by gives .
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A (3/2): stops at and forgets to divide by .
- C () and D (): come from mis-dividing or omitting the factor 2 from dx/dt.
Interesting facts
The curve , is a semicubical parabola (), famous as the first curve whose arc length was computed algebraically (by William Neile, 1657).
The recurring rule is the single most tested trap in parametric calculus MCQs.
Question details
Q7 of 44 questions
- Board
- CBSE
- Class
- Class 12
- Subject
- Applied Mathematics
- Year
- 2026
- Section
- Section A
- Marks
- 1
- Type
- MCQ
- Chapter
- Calculus (Differentiation)
- Topic
- Parametric Differentiation — second derivative
- Bloom's level
- apply
- Syllabus topic
- Unit 3: Calculus — Differentiation of parametric functions and higher order derivatives
- Author
- CBSE
- Reviewed by
- Padhantu Academic Team
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us and we will fix it.
Frequently asked questions
Why divide by again for the second derivative?
Because , and to convert d/dx into in parametric form we divide by . Skipping this step is the most common error.
Is the same as differentiating twice with respect to t?
No. It is divided by . Differentiating twice with respect to t would give a different, incorrect expression.