Q34
5 marksLong AnswerSection D

If x=cost,y=cosmtx = \cos t, y = \cos mt, prove that (1x2)d2ydx2xdydx+m2y=0(1 - x^2) \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} - x \frac{dy}{dx} + m^2 y = 0.

Continuity and Differentiability
Second Order Derivatives of Parametric Functions
Official Answer

This is a proof question — differentiate the parametric functions with respect to the parameter t, form dy/dx in terms of t, then differentiate again to reach the required second-order relation.


Setting up

  • x=cost    dx/dt=sintx = \cos t \implies dx/dt = -\sin t.
  • y=cosmt    dy/dt=msinmty = \cos mt \implies dy/dt = -m\sin mt.
  • dydx=dy/dtdx/dt=msin(mt)/sint\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy/dt}{dx/dt} = m\sin(mt)/\sin t, so sint(dy/dx)=msin(mt)\sin t \cdot (dy/dx) = m\sin(mt).

Differentiating again

  • Differentiating sinty1=msin(mt)\sin t\cdot y_1 = m\sin(mt) with respect to x (using dt/dx=1/sintdt/dx = -1/\sin t) gives, after simplification, xy1+(1x2)y2=m2y-x\cdot y_1 + (1-x^2)\cdot y_2 = -m^2 y (where y1=dydxy_1=\frac{dy}{dx}, y2=d2ydx2y_2=\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}).

Conclusion

  • Rearranging gives exactly (1x2)y2xy1+m2y=0(1-x^2)y_2 - x y_1 + m^2y = 0, which is the required result — hence proved.
parametric differentiationsecond order derivativechain ruleChebyshev differential equationimplicit differentiationd2y/dx2

Marking Scheme

  • 11 mark: correctly finding dx/dt=sintdx/dt = -\sin t and dy/dt=msin(mt)dy/dt = -m\sin(mt).
  • 21 mark: correctly forming dydx=msin(mt)/sint\frac{dy}{dx} = m\sin(mt)/\sin t, i.e. sinty1=msin(mt)\sin t \cdot y_1 = m\sin(mt).
  • 32 marks: correctly differentiating implicitly w.r.t. x (using dt/dx=1/sintdt/dx = -1/\sin t) to obtain xy1+(1x2)y2-x y_1 + (1-x^2) y_2 on the LHS.
  • 41 mark: correctly simplifying the RHS to m2y-m^2y (using cos(mt)=y\cos(mt) = y) and concluding (1x2)y2xy1+m2y=0(1-x^2)y_2 - xy_1 + m^2y = 0.

Hint

Differentiate x and y w.r.t. t separately, form dydx=msin(mt)/sint\frac{dy}{dx} = m\sin(mt)/\sin t, then differentiate sint(dy/dx)=msin(mt)\sin t\cdot(dy/dx) = m\sin(mt) implicitly w.r.t. x using dt/dx=1/sintdt/dx = -1/\sin t.

Quick Oral Answer

Since x=costx=\cos t and y=cosmty=\cos mt, dydx=msin(mt)/sint\frac{dy}{dx} = m\sin(mt)/\sin t; differentiating this again with respect to x and simplifying using sin2t=1x2\sin^2t=1-x^2 and cos(mt)=y\cos(mt)=y gives exactly (1x2)yxy+m2y=0(1-x^2)y''-xy'+m^2y=0.

Analysis & Explanation

This is a classical parametric second-derivative proof that appears repeatedly in CBSE board papers because it elegantly combines chain rule, product rule, and trigonometric identities.


Concept

  • When both x and y are given in terms of a parameter t, dydx\frac{dy}{dx} is found as (dy/dt)÷(dx/dt)(dy/dt)\div(dx/dt) — never differentiate y directly with respect to x.
  • The key algebraic trick here is recognising that sin2t=1cos2t=1x2\sin^2t = 1-\cos^2t = 1-x^2, so 1x2\sqrt{1-x^2} can replace sin t once the relation is established, allowing a purely x, y based equation to emerge.

Exam trap

  • A very common mistake is to differentiate dy/dx (in terms of t) directly with respect to t and call it d2ydx2\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} — this is WRONG; one must differentiate dy/dx with respect to x using dtdx=1dx/dt\frac{dt}{dx} = \frac{1}{dx/dt}, or equivalently differentiate the relation sinty1=msin(mt)\sin t\cdot y_1=m\sin(mt) implicitly with respect to x.
  • Students also often forget to convert cos(mt) back to y and cos t back to x at the final step, leaving the "proved" equation partly in terms of t, which loses marks.

Real-world relevance

  • This differential equation is a special case of the Chebyshev differential equation, whose solutions (Chebyshev polynomials Tm(x)=cos(marccosx)T_m(x)=\cos(m\cdot\arccos x)) are used extensively in numerical analysis, polynomial approximation, and signal processing (Chebyshev filters in electronics).

Common Mistakes

  1. 1Differentiating dydx\frac{dy}{dx} with respect to t and mislabelling the result as d2ydx2\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} instead of dividing again by dxdt\frac{dx}{dt} or differentiating implicitly w.r.t. x.
  2. 2Sign errors when substituting dt/dx=1/sintdt/dx = -1/\sin t into the chain rule expansion.
  3. 3Leaving cos(mt)\cos(mt) instead of substituting back y=cos(mt)y = \cos(mt) in the final line, so the 'proof' isn't expressed purely in x and y.

Interesting Facts

This equation is a disguised form of the Chebyshev differential equation (1x2)yxy+n2y=0(1-x^2)y'' - xy' + n^2y = 0, whose polynomial solutions Tn(x)=cos(narccosx)T_n(x) = \cos(n\cdot\arccos x) are named after Russian mathematician Pafnuty Chebyshev (1821-1894).

Chebyshev polynomials minimise the maximum error in polynomial approximation, a property exploited in modern calculators and computer software to approximate functions like sin, cos, and log efficiently.

Chebyshev filters, based on these same polynomials, are a standard building block in analog and digital electronic filter design taught in signal-processing courses.

Spotted a mistake or something unclear?

Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why can't we directly write d2ydx2=d/dt(dy/dx)\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = d/dt(dy/dx)?

Because d2ydx2\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} means differentiating dydx\frac{dy}{dx} with respect to x, not t. One must either use d/dt(dy/dx)d/dt(dy/dx) divided by dx/dtdx/dt again, or differentiate implicitly w.r.t. x using dt/dxdt/dx.

What identity converts sin2t\sin^2t into a function of x?

Since x=costx=\cos t, sin2t=1cos2t=1x2\sin^2t = 1-\cos^2t = 1-x^2, which is exactly the coefficient appearing in the required equation.

What is the significance of this differential equation?

It is a form of the Chebyshev differential equation, whose solutions are Chebyshev polynomials, widely used in approximation theory and filter design.