If , prove that .
If , prove that .
This is a proof question — differentiate the parametric functions with respect to the parameter t, form dy/dx in terms of t, then differentiate again to reach the required second-order relation.
Setting up
- .
- .
- , so .
Differentiating again
- Differentiating with respect to x (using ) gives, after simplification, (where , ).
Conclusion
- Rearranging gives exactly , which is the required result — hence proved.
Marking Scheme
- 11 mark: correctly finding and .
- 21 mark: correctly forming , i.e. .
- 32 marks: correctly differentiating implicitly w.r.t. x (using ) to obtain on the LHS.
- 41 mark: correctly simplifying the RHS to (using ) and concluding .
Hint
Differentiate x and y w.r.t. t separately, form , then differentiate implicitly w.r.t. x using .
Quick Oral Answer
Since and , ; differentiating this again with respect to x and simplifying using and gives exactly .
Analysis & Explanation
This is a classical parametric second-derivative proof that appears repeatedly in CBSE board papers because it elegantly combines chain rule, product rule, and trigonometric identities.
Concept
- When both x and y are given in terms of a parameter t, is found as — never differentiate y directly with respect to x.
- The key algebraic trick here is recognising that , so can replace sin t once the relation is established, allowing a purely x, y based equation to emerge.
Exam trap
- A very common mistake is to differentiate dy/dx (in terms of t) directly with respect to t and call it — this is WRONG; one must differentiate dy/dx with respect to x using , or equivalently differentiate the relation implicitly with respect to x.
- Students also often forget to convert cos(mt) back to y and cos t back to x at the final step, leaving the "proved" equation partly in terms of t, which loses marks.
Real-world relevance
- This differential equation is a special case of the Chebyshev differential equation, whose solutions (Chebyshev polynomials ) are used extensively in numerical analysis, polynomial approximation, and signal processing (Chebyshev filters in electronics).
Common Mistakes
- 1Differentiating with respect to t and mislabelling the result as instead of dividing again by or differentiating implicitly w.r.t. x.
- 2Sign errors when substituting into the chain rule expansion.
- 3Leaving instead of substituting back in the final line, so the 'proof' isn't expressed purely in x and y.
Interesting Facts
This equation is a disguised form of the Chebyshev differential equation , whose polynomial solutions are named after Russian mathematician Pafnuty Chebyshev (1821-1894).
Chebyshev polynomials minimise the maximum error in polynomial approximation, a property exploited in modern calculators and computer software to approximate functions like sin, cos, and log efficiently.
Chebyshev filters, based on these same polynomials, are a standard building block in analog and digital electronic filter design taught in signal-processing courses.
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why can't we directly write ?
Because means differentiating with respect to x, not t. One must either use divided by again, or differentiate implicitly w.r.t. x using .
What identity converts into a function of x?
Since , , which is exactly the coefficient appearing in the required equation.
What is the significance of this differential equation?
It is a form of the Chebyshev differential equation, whose solutions are Chebyshev polynomials, widely used in approximation theory and filter design.