Analyze why the author emphasises that both technology and personal responsibility are important in promoting road safety.
Analyze why the author emphasises that both technology and personal responsibility are important in promoting road safety.
The author emphasises technology (AI-powered cameras, GPS alerts) because it improves monitoring, catches violations and reduces human error at scale, as shown by the 40% rise in fine collection.
However, the author stresses personal responsibility equally, because rules and machines alone cannot guarantee safety — every individual's right choice, as in the slogan 'I follow, I influence', creates lasting behavioural change that technology cannot enforce on its own.
Marking Scheme
- 11 mark for explaining technology's role — improved monitoring/enforcement, reduced human error, e.g., 40% rise in fine collection or GPS alerts.
- 21 mark for explaining personal responsibility's role — individual right choices and setting an example, as in the slogan 'I follow, I influence', which technology alone cannot achieve.
Hint
Explain technology's strength (scale, enforcement) and personal responsibility's strength (behaviour, example-setting), then show why the passage says both are needed together.
Quick Oral Answer
The author values technology for catching violations and improving monitoring at scale, but insists personal responsibility matters too, since only individual right choices, not machines, can create lasting safe behaviour.
Analysis & Explanation
The passage builds a two-pronged argument for road safety.
Concept
- Technology (paragraph 4) addresses systemic gaps — enforcement, monitoring, and early alerts — at a scale humans cannot match.
- Personal responsibility (paragraph 5) addresses what technology cannot: internal motivation, ethical choice, and setting an example for others.
Exam trap
- A common error is discussing only one factor (usually technology) instead of explaining why the passage insists BOTH are necessary together, as the question specifically demands.
Real-world connection
- This mirrors real road-safety policy debates, where experts agree that infrastructure/technology and citizen behaviour must work together, since neither alone eliminates accidents caused by human choices.
Common Mistakes
- 1Discussing only technology's benefits and ignoring personal responsibility, missing half the required analysis.
- 2Merely summarising paragraphs 4 and 5 instead of explaining WHY both factors are necessary together.
- 3Omitting the textual reference (statistics or slogan) that supports each point.
Interesting Facts
Global road-safety frameworks like the 'Safe System' approach explicitly combine engineering/technology, enforcement, and human behaviour as three pillars, matching the passage's argument.
India's iRASTE pilot project uses AI to identify high-risk drivers and road stretches in real time, an example of technology working alongside human decision-making.
Studies on traffic-safety campaigns consistently find that enforcement alone plateaus in effectiveness unless paired with sustained public behavioural change.
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does the passage say technology alone is not enough for road safety?
Because technology like AI cameras and GPS alerts can enforce rules and reduce errors, but cannot instil the internal motivation or ethical choice-making that only personal responsibility provides.
What slogan does the passage use to represent personal responsibility?
'I follow, I influence' — highlighting how one person's right choice can set an example that influences others' road behaviour.