If are the zeroes of the polynomial , then find the value of .
If are the zeroes of the polynomial , then find the value of .
, obtained directly from and without solving for the individual (irrational) roots.
Marking Scheme
- 11 mark: correctly finding using the coefficient relationships.
- 21 mark: correctly combining as and arriving at the final answer -3.
Hint
Rewrite as and use — no need to find individually.
Quick Oral Answer
Using for , I get .
Analysis & Explanation
Uses the sum-product relationship between zeroes and coefficients — no need to find the actual roots.
Concept
- For : sum of zeroes , product .
- Rewrite to avoid solving for irrational roots.
Key points
- For : ⟹ .
- .
Common mistakes
- Solving the quadratic via the formula to get surd roots, then adding reciprocals — correct but slow and error-prone; the identity method is the intended 2-mark approach.
Common Mistakes
- 1Trying to find the actual irrational values of and using the quadratic formula instead of using the sum-product shortcut, wasting time and risking arithmetic slips.
- 2Sign errors when reading as +3 while computing , leading to a wrong sum of zeroes.
- 3Forgetting to divide by a (assuming always) in polynomials where the leading coefficient is not 1.
Interesting Facts
The relations and come directly from expanding and comparing coefficients with .
This 'reciprocal of zeroes' trick — expressing as — is a standard technique that also extends to finding , , or without solving for individual roots.
actually has irrational roots , which is precisely why the coefficient-relationship shortcut is essential here rather than direct computation.
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why not just solve for and directly?
The roots of are irrational (), so directly computing would involve messy surd arithmetic; using avoids this entirely.
What is the general formula used here?
For with zeroes : and ; then .