OR
The sum of the areas of two squares is . If the difference in their perimeters is 64 m, find the sides of the two squares.
OR
The sum of the areas of two squares is . If the difference in their perimeters is 64 m, find the sides of the two squares.
The sides of the two squares are 24 m and 8 m, found by substituting into and rejecting the negative root.
Marking Scheme
- 11 mark: correctly setting up from the area condition.
- 21 mark: correctly setting up from the perimeter condition (or equivalent ).
- 31 mark: substituting into the area equation and simplifying to .
- 41 mark: solving the quadratic correctly to get (rejecting with reasoning).
- 51 mark: correct final sides with units (24 m and 8 m), verification earns full credit.
Hint
Let sides be x (larger) and y (smaller); use from the perimeter condition to substitute into .
Quick Oral Answer
Taking the sides as x and y, the perimeter condition gives , and substituting into gives the quadratic , solving which and , so the sides are 24 m and 8 m.
Analysis & Explanation
A dual-condition mensuration problem combining and with quadratic solving.
Concept & method
- Use the linear condition (perimeter difference) to express one side in terms of the other, then substitute into the quadratic area condition — far simpler than solving two quadratics together.
- Perimeter difference: ; Area sum: .
- Discriminant is engineered to be a perfect square, giving whole-number roots.
Common mistakes
- Trying to solve both equations as simultaneous quadratics instead of substituting the simpler linear relation first.
- Not rejecting the negative root , since a side length cannot be negative — examiners specifically check for this.
Real-world connection
- Mirrors real design constraints, e.g., an architect fixing a combined plot area and a fixed size difference between two square plots.
Common Mistakes
- 1Writing the perimeter formula incorrectly (using instead of for a square's perimeter).
- 2Not rejecting the negative root , or presenting both roots as valid answers.
- 3Sign errors while expanding , commonly missing the middle term .
Interesting Facts
This 'sum of areas / difference of perimeters' problem format is a recurring CBSE favourite because squaring the linear perimeter relation always yields a perfect-square discriminant when the given numbers are chosen carefully, as here ().
The two squares in this problem, with sides 24 m and 8 m, are in the ratio 3:1 — a clean ratio that is often used deliberately in textbook problems to make verification straightforward.
Quadratic modelling of square plots is directly used in real estate and urban planning when subdividing land into square plots of specific combined area under given perimeter/fencing constraints.
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why substitute x = y + 16 instead of solving both equations as quadratics simultaneously?
The perimeter condition is linear, so expressing x in terms of y and substituting into the quadratic area equation reduces the problem to a single-variable quadratic, which is far simpler than solving two quadratics together.
Why is y = −24 rejected?
y represents the side length of a square, which must be a positive real number; a negative value has no geometric meaning and is therefore discarded.
How can the answer be quickly verified?
Substitute and back into both original conditions: (area condition) and (perimeter condition), both of which check out.