- (B) The sum of the areas of two squares is 640 m². If the difference in their perimeters is 64 m, find the sides of the two squares.
- (B) The sum of the areas of two squares is 640 m². If the difference in their perimeters is 64 m, find the sides of the two squares.
Official answer
The sides of the two squares are and .
Marking scheme
- 1.1 mark: assuming sides as a and b and correctly writing the perimeter condition .
- 2.1 mark: writing the area condition and substituting .
- 3.1 mark: reducing to the quadratic (after dividing by 2).
- 4.1 mark: solving to get (rejecting with reason).
- 5.1 mark: stating both sides — 24 m and 8 m (verification acceptable for the final mark).
Hint
From the perimeter condition, gives ; substitute into and solve the resulting quadratic.
Quick oral answer
Let the sides be a and b; the perimeter difference gives and the area sum gives , so substituting yields , giving and , i.e. sides of 24 m and 8 m.
Common mistakes
- 1.Writing (difference of sides) instead of (difference of perimeters), which uses the wrong linear relation and gives incorrect sides.
- 2.Not dividing by the common factor 2, leading to heavier numbers and factorisation errors.
- 3.Accepting the negative root or forgetting to reject it with the reason that a side length cannot be negative.
Analysis and explanation
A mensuration + quadratic-equation problem linking the areas and perimeters of two squares.
Concept
- Perimeter of a square = 4 × side, so the linear condition simplifies quickly to .
- Substituting into the area condition gives , which reduces (÷2) to , factorising to .
Common Mistakes
- Confusing "difference of perimeters" with "difference of sides" and writing a − b = 64 instead of .
- Skipping the division by the common factor 2, which makes the arithmetic heavier and error-prone.
- Forgetting to reject the negative root since a side length must be positive.
Real-World Relevance
- Mirrors design situations where a fixed total material area and a fixed boundary-length difference constrain the dimensions of two panels.
- Verification: and , confirming both conditions.
Interesting facts
The identity being tested here, with a linear constraint, is the same structure used in the Pythagorean theorem — many area-based quadratic problems reduce to a sum of squares equal to a constant.
Because perimeter of a square scales linearly with side while area scales with the square of the side, a difference of only 16 m in side length produces a large 512 m² difference in area (576 − 64) — a vivid illustration of why area grows quadratically.
Problems combining 'sum of areas' and 'difference of perimeters' appear regularly in CBSE because they force students to use one condition to eliminate a variable and the other to form the quadratic — testing two skills at once.
Question details
Q38 of 53 questions
- Board
- CBSE
- Class
- Class 10
- Subject
- Mathematics (Basic)
- Year
- 2026
- Section
- Section D
- Marks
- 5
- Type
- Long Answer
- Chapter
- Quadratic Equations
- Topic
- Word problem on areas of squares
- Bloom's level
- apply
- Syllabus topic
- Unit 2: Algebra — Quadratic Equations: Application (word problems involving areas and perimeters)
- Author
- CBSE
- Reviewed by
- Padhantu Academic Team
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us and we will fix it.
Frequently asked questions
Why do we use the perimeter condition to eliminate a variable rather than the area condition?
The perimeter condition is linear, so it easily rearranges to , letting us express one side in terms of the other. Substituting this into the area (which is quadratic) then leaves a single quadratic in one variable. Starting with the area equation, which has two squared terms, would be far harder to reduce.
How do I check my answer is correct?
Substitute back into both original conditions. Areas: ✓. Perimeter difference: ✓. Since both conditions hold, the sides 24 m and 8 m are correct.
Is it necessary to divide the quadratic by 2 before factorising?
It is not strictly necessary, but strongly recommended. Dividing by 2 gives with smaller coefficients that factorise cleanly into . Smaller numbers reduce the chance of arithmetic mistakes.