Q28
3 marksShort AnswerSection C

  1. Prove that 3\sqrt{3} is an irrational number.

Real Numbers
Proof of irrationality of $\sqrt{3}$
Official Answer

3\sqrt{3} is irrational. Proof by contradiction: assume 3=a/b\sqrt{3} = a/b in lowest terms (a,ba, b co-prime, b0b \ne 0). Squaring gives 3b2=a23b^2 = a^2, so 33 divides a2a^2 and, since 33 is prime, 33 divides aa; write a=3ca = 3c. Substituting gives 9c2=3b29c^2 = 3b^2, i.e. b2=3c2b^2 = 3c^2, so 33 divides b2b^2 and hence 33 divides bb. Thus 33 is a common factor of both aa and bb, contradicting that a/ba/b was in its lowest (co-prime) form. This contradiction proves the initial assumption false, so 3\sqrt{3} cannot be expressed as a/ba/b — hence 3\sqrt{3} is irrational.

proof by contradiction√3 irrationalco-prime a/ba² = 3b²3 divides aprime divides squarecommon factor contradictionFundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

Marking Scheme

  • 11 mark: setting up the contradiction — assume 3=a/b\sqrt{3} = a/b with a,ba, b co-prime integers, b0b \ne 0, and squaring to obtain a2=3b2a^2 = 3b^2.
  • 21 mark: correctly using the prime-divisibility property to conclude 33 divides aa, writing a=3ca = 3c, and deriving b2=3c2b^2 = 3c^2 so that 33 divides bb.
  • 31 mark: stating the contradiction (33 is a common factor of aa and bb, contradicting co-primality) and concluding that 3\sqrt{3} is irrational.

Hint

Assume 3=a/b\sqrt{3} = a/b in lowest terms, square to get a2=3b2a^2 = 3b^2, use the fact that 33 (a prime) dividing a2a^2 forces 33 to divide aa, then show 33 also divides bb — a contradiction.

Quick Oral Answer

I assume 3=a/b\sqrt{3} = a/b in lowest terms; squaring gives a2=3b2a^2 = 3b^2, so 33 divides aa, hence a=3ca = 3c and then b2=3c2b^2 = 3c^2 means 33 divides bb too — but a and b were co-prime, a contradiction, so 3\sqrt{3} must be irrational.

Analysis & Explanation

This is the standard NCERT proof-by-contradiction, resting on one lemma: if a prime pp divides a2a^2, then pp divides aa.


Concept

  • Assume 3\sqrt{3} is rational, i.e. 3=a/b\sqrt{3} = a/b with a,ba, b co-prime integers; squaring gives a2=3b2a^2 = 3b^2, so 33 divides a2a^2.
  • Since 33 is prime, 33 divides aa; write a=3ca = 3c, substitute back to get b2=3c2b^2 = 3c^2, so 33 divides bb too.
  • Now 33 is a common factor of aa and bb, contradicting that a/ba/b was in lowest terms — hence 3\sqrt{3} is irrational.

Common mistakes

  • Applying the divisibility lemma with a non-prime number (e.g. 44 divides 36=6236 = 6^2 but 44 does not divide 66) — the lemma only works because 3 is prime, and this must be stated.
  • Forgetting to declare at the start that a and b are co-prime — that is exactly the assumption the final contradiction breaks.

Real-world

  • The discovery that 2,3\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}, etc. cannot be written as fractions shattered the ancient Greek belief that 'all is number', reportedly troubling the Pythagoreans deeply.

Common Mistakes

  1. 1Using the divisibility property with a composite number (e.g. 'if 33 divides a2a^2 then... ' stated without noting 3 is prime, or worse applying it to 4 or 6) — the lemma holds only for primes.
  2. 2Forgetting to state at the outset that a and b are co-prime (in lowest terms), which removes the very contradiction the proof relies on.
  3. 3Writing a numerical/decimal 'proof' (e.g. 3=1.732\sqrt{3} = 1.732... never repeats) — this is not a valid proof; CBSE requires the algebraic contradiction argument.

Previously Asked

2018Section CQ253 marks

Prove that √3 is an irrational number.

2023Section CQ273 marks

Prove that √3 is irrational.

Interesting Facts

The irrationality of numbers like 2\sqrt{2} and 3\sqrt{3} was known to the ancient Greeks around the 5th century BCE; legend says the Pythagorean Hippasus was punished for revealing that such 'incommensurable' magnitudes exist.

31.7320508\sqrt{3} \approx 1.7320508\ldots is called Theodorus' constant, after Theodorus of Cyrene who proved the irrationality of the square roots of 3, 5, 7, … up to 17.

Spotted a mistake or something unclear?

Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why must a and b be co-prime at the start?

The whole proof relies on reaching a contradiction. By assuming a/b is in lowest terms (co-prime), showing that 3 divides both a and b becomes an impossibility, which is exactly the contradiction that proves 3\sqrt{3} is irrational.

Why does 33 dividing a2a^2 imply 33 divides aa?

Because 3 is a prime number. By the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, if a prime pp divides a2a^2, it must appear in the prime factorisation of aa, so pp divides aa. This fails for composite numbers like 4.

Can I prove it just by writing the decimal of 3\sqrt{3}?

No. Observing that 3=1.732\sqrt{3} = 1.732\ldots looks non-repeating is not a proof, because you cannot show non-repetition by writing finitely many digits. CBSE requires the logical contradiction argument.