OR
If , then find the value of .
OR
If , then find the value of .
The expression simplifies to . Using , the numerator , and the denominator . So the ratio equals . Given , .
Marking Scheme
- 11 mark: correctly simplifying numerator and denominator to and respectively (using identity and ), reducing expression to .
- 21 mark: correctly substituting and computing as the final answer.
Hint
Use and ; the expression reduces to .
Quick Oral Answer
I simplify the expression using and , so it becomes . Since , = 49/64.
Analysis & Explanation
Simplify the expression algebraically to before substituting the given value — this avoids messy computation.
Concept
- gives .
- Similarly, , so the ratio reduces to .
Key Points
- Substitute only after simplification to get = .
Common Mistakes
- Trying to find individually first, which forces an ugly irrational hypotenuse ().
- Not recognising and as standard identity forms.
Exam Tip
- Spotting patterns like , and simplifying before substituting saves valuable exam time.
Common Mistakes
- 1Trying to find and individually first (using the 7-8- triangle) instead of simplifying the expression algebraically — this makes the problem unnecessarily complicated and error-prone.
- 2Forgetting the identity and instead attempting to expand incorrectly.
- 3Confusing with while substituting the given value, giving the reciprocal instead of .
Interesting Facts
The identity is essentially the Pythagorean theorem rewritten for a unit circle (hypotenuse = 1), connecting trigonometry directly to geometry.
This type of 'simplify before substituting' question is a favourite CBSE VSA pattern because it rewards conceptual understanding over brute-force calculation.
The three Pythagorean trigonometric identities (, , ) were systematized in their modern algebraic form only in the 16th-17th century, even though the underlying geometric relationships were known to ancient Indian and Greek mathematicians.
Spotted a mistake or something unclear?
Tell us — we fix reported answers fast.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why not directly compute and from ?
Because that would require a right triangle with hypotenuse , an irrational number, making the calculation messy. Simplifying the expression to first avoids this altogether.
Is always equal to ?
Yes, for any angle θ, this follows directly from the Pythagorean identity , so always holds.